Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Unless you plan to have a very long-running server, you could probably just as well pay for hosting by someone else.

 

Minecraft servers are single-threaded, so you'd want to choose something with a CPU with good single-core performance. Here's a page with some such results. Also, for a server, especially one on a $400 budget, you're probably better off skipping Windows in favour of Linux and putting the money into more hardware.

Posted (edited)

I've had good experiences with Akliz, but I hear it's a bit pricey for what you get. Amazon's AWS has a free tier, but I doubt it's all that great as a server host.

 

To be honest, you should do your own research here - I have almost no experience with Minecraft server hosting.

Edited by planetguy

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...