Jump to content

vibur

Members
  • Posts

    168
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by vibur

  1. You don't need to use a sorting machine for a 1:1 item:barrel relationship.

    Redpower tubes will only output into a valid inventory. Put one of whatever item you want to sort into each barrel. Have a placeholder item (like cobble) in barrels that you can't seed yet. The tubes will only put items into barrels that already have the particular item. Have an overflow chest at the end to catch what doesn't get put into barrels.

    You can use a panel to cover the bottom side of the barrels if necessary.

  2. Rules are always made up to enforce some kind of morality.

    Whether you like it or not, the morality you are enforcing right now by changing avatar pictures like this is to ridicule anyone that doesn't follow the thought process of the mob

    /s/thought process of the mob/rules

    Things like this are really a wrong way of doing things if you ask me.

    Nobody asked.

  3. CovertJaguar: "In order to receive permission to distribute RailCraft in your new modpack, I'm going to need you to publicly reveal your private communications with the writers of the other mods in your pack."

    IceWolf: "Well, that's not how we operate because that stuff is private and, you know, none of your damn business. There won't be any of that posted publicly."

    CovertJaguar: "Then you don't have permission to distribute RailCraft in your modpack."

    IceWolf: "No problem. We'll take it out."

    Bytas: "You WILL post that shit publicly because I WANT RAILCRAFT. I want it NOW and I DON'T want to install it myself. Also, you are NOT professional and you SHOULD DEFINITELY NOT run your forums the way YOU want because I KNOW BETTER."

    I totally made all those quotes up but I think I've described it pretty accurately.

  4. Your ideas of 'them' and 'us' don't jive with what happened last night between slow-of-pokes and Calc of UE, on either legitimacy, foolhardiness *or* hurt feelings.

    The legitimacy also doesn't jive with the current FTB policy of including RP2 in private modpacks.

    They assume that Eloraam's posted mod compilation policy gives carte blanche for RP2 to be included until she says otherwise.

    I wonder what Sengir would say about that.

  5. Using the layout DW20 used in Season 3 SMP: http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/v3/reactorplanner.html?21p7ds7vmlpuugevixzfassk3rrpkq6s0chuzcn6pw5iwcv9l17gdfus1kstulqxgigg1zl73grp1q8

    Mark I-EA, 64M EU/cycle (320 EU/t), have it rigged to auto-shutoff once the MFSUs are full.

    This is the breeder I'm using: http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/v3/reactorplanner.html?pvnpvubpujjlty7bb7wscbtdvmu6x8dty2rqubxm7xtfmg1g55hj3bjf34e8ly4aba4vpbxkbdgo8lz30

    The planner lies, though. It actually puts out 10 EU/t rather than 5.

    Stole it from somewhere but damned if I can remember. After building these two, I'm woefully short on copper so I don't think I'll be expanding the breeder anytime soon.

  6. It may be useless right now but it looks like it'll be pretty neat in release. Until it has a purpose I won't be including it in my modpack.

    Yeah. Don't get me wrong - I think the decorative stuff looks really good and I have it installed just for that. I'm just saying that there's not much else to it and it seems like vaporware at this point.

    There are some right pains on that server who despite being there to test out their mods just troll non stop and get on everyones nerves.

    Those that watch will know who I am talking of.

    But enough about RichardG.

  7. All the mod does right now is add ores that serve no purpose other than decoration (despite looking cool) and make grass drop corn which can be cooked into popcorn.

  8. im fairly sure youre correct with that one

    Well, I'm fairly sure he's not because I'm fairly sure that the FTB Launcher is based on MultiMC.

    this seems like a ridiculous question. They want to show themselves to be better than technic and have complete separation. Even though it's pretty much the same thing. In fact, if I'm not mistaken, it was started by technic.

    I don't get why his question is ridiculous and yours isn't. That's not to say either is ridiculous. I just don't see an increase in the level of ridiculousness by transposing two proper names.

×
×
  • Create New...