I like your launcher, but why can I not have it use a proxy like I can the Mojang launcher? I've been using Java's built-in proxy flags for months now, and am somewhat dependent on it.
I can see not passing the memory flags, as you guys handle that yourselves... But why not pass the other flags? The proxy stuff should be transparent for everything you're doing, and the network I'm on requires the use of a proxy for anything other than 80 and 443.
I haven't poked around your code to see if there's an actual reason for restarting the launcher with a different set of flags, but this makes Tekkit unusable for me for most of the day. I see mention that proxy support is planned, but... It's already built in to Java, why can't I use that functionality?
Question
izzy84075
I like your launcher, but why can I not have it use a proxy like I can the Mojang launcher? I've been using Java's built-in proxy flags for months now, and am somewhat dependent on it.
I can see not passing the memory flags, as you guys handle that yourselves... But why not pass the other flags? The proxy stuff should be transparent for everything you're doing, and the network I'm on requires the use of a proxy for anything other than 80 and 443.
I haven't poked around your code to see if there's an actual reason for restarting the launcher with a different set of flags, but this makes Tekkit unusable for me for most of the day. I see mention that proxy support is planned, but... It's already built in to Java, why can't I use that functionality?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
1 answer to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now