Jump to content

Question

Posted

Launcher Version: 3.1

Operating System: windows

Java Version: latest

Antivirus Program: trend micro titanium

Description of Problem:

it will open up to were it says checking launcher version then close that and wont open

Error Messages:

no error msg

Error Log:


none

23 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Posted

Sorry you need to give more Information for anyone to help you. With just that description and no Error message OR Log, no one can help you. If I see things like this I would usually say just delete your .techniclauncher and let it download again

  • 0
Posted

Sorry you need to give more Information for anyone to help you. With just that description and no Error message OR Log, no one can help you. If I see things like this I would usually say just delete your .techniclauncher and let it download again

Same exact thing happens to me!!! someone help! I tried re-downloading three times! it didnt help one bit! All the info. he gave is the same for me.

  • 0
Posted

WINDOWS?!?! I THOUGHT YOU WERE RUNNING MINEOS!

Yeah. Give us a detailed report. What version? 32 or 64 bit?

Java. "The latest" just doesn't cut it. I could be living under a rock and think Java 5u4 is the latest.

Try disabling your firewall and anti virus. Then, when your computer has choked to death, report back to us.

  • 0
Posted

That's an error we typically see when the launcher is being blocked by your antivirus. Try adding it as an exception in your AV.

  • 0
Posted

WINDOWS?!?! I THOUGHT YOU WERE RUNNING MINEOS!

Yeah. Give us a detailed report. What version? 32 or 64 bit?

Java. "The latest" just doesn't cut it. I could be living under a rock and think Java 5u4 is the latest.

Try disabling your firewall and anti virus. Then, when your computer has choked to death, report back to us.

i have 64 bit java

  • 0
Posted

So in other words you were outright lying when you said this?

dude the only thing different is the anti-virus. its not a lie if most is true. i didnt see his comment of the antivirus. so do you have good advice or not?

  • 0
Posted

dude the only thing different is the anti-virus. its not a lie if most is true. i didnt see his comment of the antivirus. so do you have good advice or not?

Yes. I do have good advice. Stop threadjacking.

  • 0
Posted

whatever. i dont give a crap. talk about bad suport

It's not poor support, you're exhibiting poor manners by intruding on someone else's help request with something that isn't the same problem. Learn to tell the difference, and to spell.

  • 0
Posted

It's not poor support, you're exhibiting poor manners by intruding on someone else's help request with something that isn't the same problem. Learn to tell the difference, and to spell.

OK, first off i know how to spell. And if i wasnt allowed to comment, why was it on google? And im having the same problem except i dont have an antivirus. And no thanks to you i figured out how to fix it. Obviously you guys dont know anything if you can not fix a little problem.

  • 0
Posted

OK, first off i know how to spell. And if i wasnt allowed to comment, why was it on google? And im having the same problem except i dont have an antivirus. And no thanks to you i figured out how to fix it. Obviously you guys dont know anything if you can not fix a little problem.

How does that logic even begin to make sense?

You refused to make your own bug report, and instead piggybacked on a guy who DID make a bug report that WASN'T THE SAME as the one you would have made.

  • 0
Posted

And no thanks to you i figured out how to fix it.

How does that logic even begin to make sense?

You refused to make your own bug report, and instead piggybacked on a guy who DID make a bug report that WASN'T THE SAME as the one you would have made.

I'll stack on top of this by adding that if you could just as easily, no thanks to me, figure it out yourself, why bother posting at all?

  • 0
Posted

How does that logic even begin to make sense?

You refused to make your own bug report, and instead piggybacked on a guy who DID make a bug report that WASN'T THE SAME as the one you would have made.

There was one tiny little difference, i didn't think it was necessary. I thought i could just say that i don't have an antivirus. Whats the difference between me saying i had one thing different ( which was in fact basically giving you an obvious idea of the bug report i would have written) and me writing a bug report.

  • 0
Posted

The difference is that your problems may not be the same, due to those "tiny" little differences (except that having or not having an antivirus is a huge difference), your solutions could be wildly different.

think of it this way.

You and someone else have cars that don't start. It sounds like the engine is turning over, but then it makes a clunking sound.

The only difference is that Person A has a ford Mustang, and you have a Ford Pinto.

The solution to Mustangs problem is to check the alternator. The solution to YOUR problem is to run the fuck away because your car is about to explode.

  • 0
Posted

The difference is that your problems may not be the same, due to those "tiny" little differences (except that having or not having an antivirus is a huge difference), your solutions could be wildly different.

think of it this way.

You and someone else have cars that don't start. It sounds like the engine is turning over, but then it makes a clunking sound.

The only difference is that Person A has a ford Mustang, and you have a Ford Pinto.

The solution to Mustangs problem is to check the alternator. The solution to YOUR problem is to run the fuck away because your car is about to explode.

ok...

  • 0
Posted

Mine also does this, i get this error message however...

************** Exception Text **************

System.ComponentModel.Win32Exception: The system cannot find the file specified

at System.Diagnostics.Process.StartWithCreateProcess(ProcessStartInfo startInfo)

at System.Diagnostics.Process.Start(ProcessStartInfo startInfo)

at TechnicLauncher.Program.RunLauncher(String launcherPath)

at TechnicLauncher.Form1.DownloadStringCompleted(Object sender, DownloadStringCompletedEventArgs e)

************** Loaded Assemblies **************

mscorlib

Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0

Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.5456 (Win7SP1GDR.050727-5400)

CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/Microsoft.NET/Framework64/v2.0.50727/mscorlib.dll

----------------------------------------

TechnicLauncher

Assembly Version: 1.0.1.0

Win32 Version: 1.0.1.0

CodeBase: file:///C:/Users/jim/Downloads/TechnicLauncher(5).exe

----------------------------------------

System.Windows.Forms

Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0

Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.5460 (Win7SP1GDR.050727-5400)

CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Windows.Forms/2.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.Windows.Forms.dll

----------------------------------------

System

Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0

Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.5456 (Win7SP1GDR.050727-5400)

CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System/2.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.dll

----------------------------------------

System.Drawing

Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0

Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.5462 (Win7SP1GDR.050727-5400)

CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Drawing/2.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/System.Drawing.dll

----------------------------------------

System.Configuration

Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0

Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.5420 (Win7SP1.050727-5400)

CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Configuration/2.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/System.Configuration.dll

----------------------------------------

System.Xml

Assembly Version: 2.0.0.0

Win32 Version: 2.0.50727.5420 (Win7SP1.050727-5400)

CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Xml/2.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.Xml.dll

----------------------------------------

************** JIT Debugging **************

To enable just-in-time (JIT) debugging, the .config file for this

application or computer (machine.config) must have the

jitDebugging value set in the system.windows.forms section.

The application must also be compiled with debugging

enabled.

For example:

<configuration>

<system.windows.forms jitDebugging="true" />

</configuration>

When JIT debugging is enabled, any unhandled exception

will be sent to the JIT debugger registered on the computer

rather than be handled by this dialog box.

  • 0
Posted

Good lord, must you threadjack? Especially when one of the posts says not to?!

(Hint hint:

Yes. I do have good advice. Stop threadjacking.

)

  • 0
Posted

Start > Run > %appdata% > .techniclauncher > technic-launcher.jar > Enjoy!

That's all that needs to be said, Nothing further, (Sorry if this post was duplicated or replied a second time, I accidentally went to the previous page and saw this post was likely deleted, I just want to end this not being able to start up tekkit crap.)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...