mrdare360 Posted April 16, 2012 Posted April 16, 2012 Could you guys tell me if this is a good reactor? http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/reactorplanner.html?hixs32p9dcle5kvkxd7sbva7n6rapdax51vq0sfui7b6xl0qo If there is a better one please tell me, it must be a Mark 1 - O though.
Arkalius Posted April 16, 2012 Posted April 16, 2012 Well it will work but it's inefficient and wasteful... You should never put uranium cells on the edge of the reactor. They end up generating more heat that way for no benefit. My Mark 2 reactor only has 14 heat dispersers in it, you definitely don't need 18 of them. This design has the same power output but uses less components: http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/reactorplanner.html?hixmyxaaymlkz4lwkeazaekgwik2qwwrwj077tw7rl3zmy51c Here's another design that only requires 5 chambers and is more efficient than yours for the same power output. You can make it 6 chambers and get rid of one cooling cell too if you want. http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/reactorplanner.html?hixfb4ut2sql48wlj33qvs1pqwi98scik4ds5s0de76968we8
Chezzik Posted April 16, 2012 Posted April 16, 2012 I figured that even my first reactor should have 2.0 efficiency. This is what I built for my first reactor: http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/reactorplanner.html?hivxlczc1dr3itmc0cdiab9tr94liy4i8m6fl9xfn9xtde3pc It's extremely simple to set up, uses very few components, and it has 2.0 efficiency. That's better than any of the designs shown so far! 2.0 efficiency is pretty good for a design that doesn't need to be auto-filled with ice. This design only handles 2 uranium cells at a time, but it's so cheap, you can build a bunch of these little reactors for the cost of 1 or 2 big ones. I highly recommend it. I have seen Mark I-0 reactors with efficiency as high as 2.5 without ice, but they're considerably more costly. Of course, you didn't define "good". If you have an unlimited supply of uranium, then you may not care too much about efficiency. But UU matter cannot be made into uranium, and EE condensers cannot create uranium, so it's always a scarce material. Assuming that you don't have a chest full of uranium, your design is pretty bad.
BFManticore Posted April 17, 2012 Posted April 17, 2012 Here's a perfectly automated, nearly 100% efficient nuclear power generator, with 1800 eu/t that I made. It has a very efficient cooling system and is a Mark 1-1 SUC, I believe. I will be putting this into my survival world soon. http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?ka7ceyu26emeyg1 Just put the file in the zip in your save folder. The output is the mass fabricator.
mrdare360 Posted April 17, 2012 Author Posted April 17, 2012 Here's a perfectly automated, nearly 100% efficient nuclear power generator, with 1800 eu/t that I made. It has a very efficient cooling system and is a Mark 1-1 SUC, I believe. I will be putting this into my survival world soon. http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?ka7ceyu26emeyg1 Just put the file in the zip in your save folder. The output is the mass fabricator. Sorry, but could you recreate it in the nuclear reactor planner and send me the link? I don't like downloading stuff from people i don't know.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now