Jump to content

Typical_Name

Members
  • Posts

    101
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Typical_Name

  1. Actually, it's the old dimension still . The new dimension is the one without ores. In retrospect, that doesn't make a whole lot of sense, but I expect the OreNether to be regenerated every now and then (probably every month or two).
  2. Accepted. And yes Junithorn, we enabled ComputerCraft. I haven't fully configured it yet though, so some features might not work.
  3. I'll try and add ComputerCraft back in when I can. I probably won't be able to log in for the next day or two, I'll be way too busy with homework. Let me know over the forums if there's any problems.
  4. Hmm... are there any IronChest chests in it? That's the only thing I can think of :/.
  5. I threw in the math question because a few people (and this was MULTIPLE people) were having trouble interpreting coordinate directions, as they were apparently unaware of the difference between positive and negative numbers.
  6. Ah, that makes sense, and it would explain why I haven't been able to find further information on the malware thing. I feel kind of silly now . Anyways, can Computercraft computers do anything that redpower computers cannot?
  7. Hmm, there was some bug with block drops earlier today. I think we've fixed it. My only hypothesis is that it had something to do with DisguiseCraft, which I tried installing last night and just now removed.
  8. Well, it's not so much the miner that I'm worried about - you have a point that it's unlikely anyone will ever approach it once it starts to spend more time away from its home (from what I understand of the guy's design, it's meant to travel in a straight line and harvest all the ores in its path, and then come back and deposit them). What I'm worried about is that someone's going to try and use this concept to make a defensive machine that "works" by crashing all nearby clients. Anyone dumb enough to try that would almost certainly get banned since this machine would have to be bulky and hard to hide, but since there's so many legitimate uses for redpower frames, I'd probably only be able to apply the bans retroactively, meaning that if the practice became popular, gameplay would be severely harmed. Another thing, perhaps more important, is that there's legitimate uses of vehicles that involve people being around (ie, if someone wanted to make a transport airship or a bomber), which would become rather impractical if people crashed and had to log back in constantly. So, I want to find out what's causing these problems, because I've seen videos of redpower vehicles that work fine without crashing, so there must be something specific that the redpower frames aren't liking. If it helps with the diagnosis, these are the features I observe on the craft: Obviously, there are redpower things. These include frames, a computer, wires (bundled cable and insulated cable), motors, battery boxes, deployers, retrievers, filters, pneumatic tubes, covers, solar panels, and blutricity. An IC2 solar panel, MFSU, glass fibre cable, LV transformer, MV transformer, and miners A diamond chest from the IronChests mod Also, from what he tells me, it only crashes when going east and west.
  9. I'd prefer not to have to ban redpower frames. Redpower vehicles are one of my favorite aspects of Tekkit, and I shouldn't have to put up with gamebreaking bugs in a finished modpack.
  10. Deeds, instances like this are why I allow the use of the /home command. (It takes 35 seconds of not moving or taking damage to charge up and has a half-hour cooldown, so try not to get used to it.)
  11. Title: Redpower frames sometimes crash nearby clients Version: 3.1.2 OS: Windows 7 Java Version: 7 Description of Problem: One of the players on my server built this spiffy redpower vehicle that mines for him automatically. However, we've noticed that our clients frequently crash when we're near this machine, and we're not sure why. The people on the irc said that it was because of the wireless redstone mechanisms on the craft, so we got rid of them, but the problem persisted. I have found a few threads reporting similar errors, but none of them seemed to contain a consistent solution. Error Messages: None; the screen on the client simply goes to the dirt background, and then white. The only error log that looked like it might be relevant is below: Error Log: [21:18:24] [sEVERE] Exception in thread "AWT-EventQueue-0" [21:18:24] [sEVERE] java.lang.NullPointerException: component argument pData [21:18:24] [sEVERE] at sun.java2d.windows.GDIWindowSurfaceData.initOps(Native Method) [21:18:24] [sEVERE] at sun.java2d.windows.GDIWindowSurfaceData.<init>(Unknown Source) [21:18:24] [sEVERE] at sun.java2d.windows.GDIWindowSurfaceData.createData(Unknown Source) [21:18:24] [sEVERE] at sun.java2d.d3d.D3DScreenUpdateManager.getGdiSurface(Unknown Source) [21:18:24] [sEVERE] at sun.java2d.d3d.D3DScreenUpdateManager.createGraphics(Unknown Source) [21:18:24] [sEVERE] at sun.awt.windows.WComponentPeer.getGraphics(Unknown Source) [21:18:24] [sEVERE] at java.awt.Component.getGraphics(Unknown Source) [21:18:24] [sEVERE] at sun.awt.RepaintArea.paint(Unknown Source) [21:18:24] [sEVERE] at sun.awt.windows.WComponentPeer.handleEvent(Unknown Source) [21:18:24] [sEVERE] at java.awt.Component.dispatchEventImpl(Unknown Source) [21:18:24] [sEVERE] at java.awt.Component.dispatchEvent(Unknown Source) [21:18:24] [sEVERE] at java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEventImpl(Unknown Source) [21:18:24] [sEVERE] at java.awt.EventQueue.access$000(Unknown Source) [21:18:24] [sEVERE] at java.awt.EventQueue$3.run(Unknown Source) [21:18:24] [sEVERE] at java.awt.EventQueue$3.run(Unknown Source) [21:18:24] [sEVERE] at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) [21:18:24] [sEVERE] at java.security.ProtectionDomain$1.doIntersectionPrivilege(Unknown Source) [21:18:24] [sEVERE] at java.security.ProtectionDomain$1.doIntersectionPrivilege(Unknown Source) [21:18:24] [sEVERE] at java.awt.EventQueue$4.run(Unknown Source) [21:18:24] [sEVERE] at java.awt.EventQueue$4.run(Unknown Source) [21:18:24] [sEVERE] at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) [21:18:24] [sEVERE] at java.security.ProtectionDomain$1.doIntersectionPrivilege(Unknown Source) [21:18:24] [sEVERE] at java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEvent(Unknown Source) [21:18:24] [sEVERE] at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpOneEventForFilters(Unknown Source) [21:18:24] [sEVERE] at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForFilter(Unknown Source) [21:18:24] [sEVERE] at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForHierarchy(Unknown Source) [21:18:24] [sEVERE] at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(Unknown Source) [21:18:24] [sEVERE] at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(Unknown Source) [21:18:24] [sEVERE] at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(Unknown Source)
  12. ... Ok, I'll grant you that the absolute value of -1500 is larger, but that's not quite what I asked for. Accepted anyway, I'll make the question more specific >_<.
  13. Lots of people are greylist accepters. Mighty is just the only one besides me that bothers to actually do it .
  14. We're still trying to devise the war model. Accounting for every possible flaw gets complicated . If we keep the bedrock tower thing, it would involve using the MagicSpells plugin to destroy the bedrock tower in a ritual that involved three people and several minutes (at least). (I can configure spells so that they require things like reagents, people, time, and only work on certain blocks) Its purpose would be to allow a nation to be defeated in the event that all of its members refused to log in for a fight. However, this has problems (ie, that a city only needs one person to make but would need three people to attack, hence why I'm considering a new settlement tier).
  15. I'll accept it once the server's back up, sorry about the wait. (Should be pretty soon.)
×
×
  • Create New...