skullord Posted June 26, 2012 Share Posted June 26, 2012 i'm not sure if this is the right place but seems like the closest in the forums. i want to change the output of a red matter furnace when smelting dust (iron, copper, tin, etc.) too 2, like with ore. i DO know this can be abused, but im only using it for my single-player world, i don't see how exploiting it (which i don't plan too do) would hurt anyone ( besides there's nei anyway) no angry ragesponses plz. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Industrial Miner Posted June 26, 2012 Share Posted June 26, 2012 I don't think that it is possible to change that in the config or whatever. You may have to wait until a future update or ask Pahimar on his thread/IRC channel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neowulf Posted June 26, 2012 Share Posted June 26, 2012 If you're doing it in Modders Metropolis Questions then you must be looking to poke around the code yourself, because it's stated quite clearly that this is the place for programmers to share information and expertise on modding while SSP questions belong ion the Technic SSP section. So. Take your freshly decompiled EE source and look for the red matter furnace tile entity. In there should be the code for doubling drops. Look for a bit of code that creates a new stack, that should be the output part and will have the logic for doubling the output of smelting operations. Probably just a simple switch statement with a case for each of the ore blocks, though it could be an if statement checking for "instanceof" (that might make all ores compatible with EE by default, though I haven't looked at ore blocks yet to see if that's even possible). Just insert the dust items into the logic with the ore blocks. Recompile successfully, and you're done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jakj Posted June 27, 2012 Share Posted June 27, 2012 Though first check to make sure that the EE guy might not have been smart and used a list instead of a switch statement, in which case you could add to the list by reflection instead of replacement. I wouldn't get my hopes up, but it could be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now