Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have 3 servers, configured, with a print screen:

Note: All three are Dell PowerEdge 2950's.

They differ in generation (I, II, III).

- http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/402/screenshot20120822at103.png/

- http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/594/screenshot20120822at103.png/

- http://imageshack.us/f/18/screenshot20120822at115.png/

My Internet Speed:

Down: 40MB/s

Up: 4MB/s

My question:

Which server will work best,and will they be able to host:

24/7, 10-15 players.

Posted

I have 3 servers, configured, with a print screen:

Note: All three are Dell PowerEdge 2950's.

They differ in generation (I, II, III).

- http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/402/screenshot20120822at103.png/

- http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/594/screenshot20120822at103.png/

- http://imageshack.us/f/18/screenshot20120822at115.png/

My Internet Speed:

Down: 40MB/s

Up: 4MB/s

My question:

Which server will work best,and will they be able to host:

24/7, 10-15 players.

10-15 players yeah, but I'd say that'll be your limit because of the shitty 4Mbit upstream. You can put up more player slots but it'll be laggy. It's a matter of quality vs. quantity. Any of those systems can handle more than that so I'd say go for the cheapest one.

Posted

So which of the three servers is the best to use for this?

The $314.99. Like I said, your shitty upstream bandwidth will be the bottleneck so it doesn't matter which one you get. Now, if you're planning on upgrading your internet, that's a different story.

Posted

I have hosted about 20-25 players at the same time no lag, with my "shitty" internet. So that is no problem.

Also, yes, I am thinking about upgrading to glasvezel (100MB/s up and down)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...