Tyl3r684 Posted August 29, 2012 Posted August 29, 2012 So this is my setup for power on force field, is it as efficient as it can be?
gavjenks Posted August 29, 2012 Posted August 29, 2012 ?? This just looks like a force field that happens to be next to a nuclear reactor. WHich won't protect anything, because if the reactor blows up, it will destroy the core and projector and thus remove the forcefield, then destroy everything outside. If you want to contain a reactor by force fields, you need to use multiple area projectors facing inward (so it cant blow up the projectors), or use the specialized, premade MFFS nuclear reactor core force field system.
Tyl3r684 Posted August 29, 2012 Author Posted August 29, 2012 ?? This just looks like a force field that happens to be next to a nuclear reactor. WHich won't protect anything, because if the reactor blows up, it will destroy the core and projector and thus remove the forcefield, then destroy everything outside. If you want to contain a reactor by force fields, you need to use multiple area projectors facing inward (so it cant blow up the projectors), or use the specialized, premade MFFS nuclear reactor core force field system. no no no, The reactor is POWERING the forcefield to keep it running!
gavjenks Posted August 29, 2012 Posted August 29, 2012 Oh well in that case, I'm not sure what you mean by efficient. Space wise? No. You could move the projector and its upgrade down below, nestled between two of the chambers, and you could have the injector butted up directly against the chambers with no wires. Both of these would decrease the dimensions of your whole box.
Xylord Posted August 29, 2012 Posted August 29, 2012 I think the setup I use here (Scroll down) is about as efficient as it can get. Remember to step down your current with HV transformers so you can use glass fibre cable.
gavjenks Posted August 29, 2012 Posted August 29, 2012 I think the setup I use here (Scroll down) is about as efficient as it can get. Remember to step down your current with HV transformers so you can use glass fibre cable. If you have spare diamonds, yes.If you dont, just use HV cable, save yourself multiple diamonds (for cables and HV transformers), and still transfer over 99% of your energy to the end target for cable distances less than about 20 long.
Xylord Posted August 29, 2012 Posted August 29, 2012 If you have spare diamonds, yes.If you dont, just use HV cable, save yourself multiple diamonds (for cables and HV transformers), and still transfer over 99% of your energy to the end target for cable distances less than about 20 long. Honestly, when you need that much energy, you have plenty of diamonds. :D
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now