Resource Efficiency

[menneske2]

When I ran Technic SSP with a 128x128 texture pack i only got 2 fps.

When I ported it to not use the launcher I got 64 fps.

I haven't seen any posts like this here yet, so it might just be my computer.

Launcher build: 0.5.0

[Bmandk]

It's probably the texture pack. Which one are you using?

[menneske2]

Sphax PureBDcraft

but it runs slow on default too. And in the port the texture pack worked fine

[Bmandk]

Hmm.. I'm using that one too, and i'm not having any lag. How big is the resolution you're using?

[menneske2]

1080p

but it performs at 70fps without the launcher, im just going to wait until the launcher updates

[Bmandk]

I kinda meant which resolution of the texturepack you're using. Maybe you also used an outdated texture for one of the mods?

[menneske2]

the texture pack is 128x128

but the problem is the launcher! the texture pack worked fine with all the same mods ported to not use the launcher

[Cheap Shot]

That really shouldn't matter. The launcher closes when you start minecraft. Then it's just minecraft running. You're saying you "get awful lag when you run modded minecraft, but it's just fine when you run modded minecraft."

[killerx09]

One thing to note here: If you set the ram setting to something that your computer cannot supply, you get a fixed ram of 246mb.

I learned this the hard way when I tried to set it to 2gb of ram and got 246mb instead.

[menneske2]

I have 12GB ram and set it to use 8. after a while the game goes to the saving chunks screen. without the launcher 1GB works perfectly

[KakerMix]

I have 12GB ram and set it to use 8. after a while the game goes to the saving chunks screen. without the launcher 1GB works perfectly

Its been stated before, but why not set your Technic/Tekkit game to run off of 1 Gig of ram and see what happens? You might be surprised.

[menneske2]

stuff is working properly now, 60 fps with 128x128 texture pack

EDIT: after a few minutes i go back to 2fps, im going to use my port until there's a new version