I see what your thinking and thats a good thought but just does not hold very well. When we are talking about speeds of light and the mass of black holes reletivity takes a nose dive in logic.
Now all of this on is thought experiment. This is me typing and working out the logic as I go. Read it all because I'll probibly bounce between ideas a lot.
[crazy thought experiment]
When travling at the speed of light, time for the object moving is nil i.e. it is not passing through time. Adding to that the mass of a black hole with it's time dilation propertys, your looking at an ageless partical (As they don't experience time) going back in time possibly. Now this would be, increadable if not a pardox. It means that as soon as light enters a black hole (Or gets close for that matter) the particle is going abck in time.
Since we can see the light that gets close to the event horizon, that means even though it would be travling back in time, we can still see it as if it was not. This raises the question of time travle... I'll go back to that later.
Now inside the event horizon, the time dialation would tip the laws of physics on it's head and it's just FUBR and we can only guess at what might happen. My guess would be that time in the black hole would be destroyed in terms of light unless light does not work on the same principals of matter. Going back to the time travle of ageless light particals, and the fact they can still be seen means that they do not obey the same laws we do in regards to space-time. Since even with this time dialation issue they are still predictable, I can say that they do obey newtonian physics even under these ridiculous circumstances. This means they should obey the same laws still inside the black hole therefore orbit the same.
[/crazy thought experiment]
Edit for the 10 minute 's
Thats a cool read.
I was more meaning in a perfect sence of the world. I think that my example still holds true.