Demanding child demands things *Superstar*

[mcmonster]

Re: tekkit 3.00 SMP

im sorry guys, i have a headache and am a little grumpy.

sorry for pestering and i hope this has turned nobody against me.

I am literally sitting here at my desk, trying to think of something witty to say, but all that's coming out is me saying "what?" over and over.

Gold star OP, definitely a strong candidate for Superstar Thread of the Week.

and yes that would be funny since this is my first thread.

thx everyone

(and if anyone want's to talk about the coming tekkit update please feal free)

and ?jay could u make me a normal user

[mcmonster]

Re: tekkit 3.00 SMP

i have no more headache (yay)

[sct]

Re: tekkit 3.00 SMP

Thanks for keeping us up-to-date on your health.

[Jay?]

Re: tekkit 3.00 SMP

and ?jay could u make me a normal user

Absolutely not.

[vidplace7]

Re: tekkit 3.00 SMP

Absolutely not.

+1

[SimpleGuy]

Re: tekkit 3.00 SMP

MOD EDIT: No' date=' and no. So much no. There is no "Beta" testing. We aren't some fancy corporate software company. You don't get beta items for playtesting a beta. No. And no signing posts.[/b']

Also I changed your profile. You earned it.

[Jay?]

Re: tekkit 3.00 SMP

+1

Don't do that. There's a reason that feature isn't implemented as part of the site.

[Jagmar]

Re: tekkit 3.00 SMP

Don't do that. There's a reason that feature isn't implemented as part of the site.

Are high fives allowed?

[vidplace7]

Re: tekkit 3.00 SMP

Are high fives allowed?

We need a google+ api implemented on this forum :D

[Jay?]

Re: tekkit 3.00 SMP

Are high fives allowed?

The rule is effort and quality. If it adds something to the thread it's fine, if it's just "lol i agree" "high five" "+1" "like" or any other form of 0 content popularity contest junk, it will not go over well.

We need a google+ api implemented on this forum

That would be awful. When the forums were first born, this was a subject that was decided on very swiftly. There will be no popularity contest buttons on the site.

[vidplace7]

Re: tekkit 3.00 SMP

That is understandable, thanks for the clarification.

[SimpleGuy]

Re: tekkit 3.00 SMP

There will be no popularity contest buttons on the site.

For good measure, no one wants the let-down when realizing that they're not as popular as Cheapshot.

[Jay?]

Re: tekkit 3.00 SMP

For good measure, no one wants the let-down when realizing that they're not as popular as Cheapshot.

It's true, my poor little heart would probably just give out if i found out that i wasn't the single most popular person on the board.

[Taco_Dan]

Re: tekkit 3.00 SMP

*sigh* I love this forum.

[mcmonster]

Re: tekkit 3.00 SMP

Fine than ill just make a new account, or u can just MAKE ME NORMAL

Thanks for keeping us up-to-date on your health.

yes im good at it

Also I changed your profile. You earned it.

i like the smiley

and i dont get whats wrong what signing posts, i never saw a rule that said "NO SIGNING POSTS" so how could i have known?

(there i am lerning a new smiley)

[mcmonster]

Re: tekkit 3.00 SMP

*sigh* I love this forum.

where SOOO alike I DO TO! :P

[Pilchard123]

Re: tekkit 3.00 SMP

Just...just leave. Please. I'm normally quite a forgiving, tolerant guy, but you just...I have no words for what you are doing.

See, this is why I hate dynamic IPs. You can't just IP ban these people, since you run the risk of knocking off a legitimate user.

[Jay?]

Re: tekkit 3.00 SMP

Fine than ill just make a new account, or u can just MAKE ME NORMALyes im good at iti like the smiley

and i dont get whats wrong what signing posts, i never saw a rule that said "NO SIGNING POSTS" so how could i have known?

(there i am lerning a new smiley)

Okay buddy, I'll change your account.

Also, not reading a rule is not a defense for not following it. It says so in the rules.

[danidas]

Re: tekkit 3.00 SMP

From the very top of the forums:

http://forums.technicpack.net/index.php/topic,4903.0.html

Read the rules.

[mcmonster]

Re: tekkit 3.00 SMP

From the very top of the forums:

http://forums.technicpack.net/index.php/topic,4903.0.html

Read the rules.

im sorry it wasn't even my username, it was "monster of mc" when my username is mcmonster.

please make me NORMAL other wise i might *blood all over the computer*

so please i wont mess up, please give me another chance.

[Jay?]

Re: tekkit 3.00 SMP

im sorry it wasn't even my username, it was "monster of mc" when my username is mcmonster.

please make me NORMAL other wise i might *blood all over the computer*

so please i wont mess up, please give me another chance.

No.

[mcmonster]

Re: tekkit 3.00 SMP

"I DEMAND THINGS FROM MODS AND SHIT POST EVERYWHERE"

i dont please, ill just make another account.

if you want me to post less please say so

[Jay?]

Re: tekkit 3.00 SMP

"I DEMAND THINGS FROM MODS AND SHIT POST EVERYWHERE"

i dont please, ill just make another account.

if you want me to post less please say so

Fuck it. Banned. Goodbye forever.

[SimpleGuy]

I changed his profile again. Too bad his cries are now muffled.

EDIT: Looking forward to banning his new account(s).

[mcmonster_is_back]

way to go you got anonymous and itoxic hacking teams on you

way to try (AND FAIL) at baning mcmonster

FUCK YOU

you will regret