Torezu Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 What's wrong with the newest/any version of OptiFine? Optical zoom is something I have a lot of trouble living without. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jono0259 Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 So I had to turn of the bigdig type ore generation and I think did it right. Just went into /Config/CofH/World.cfg and set "B:ReplaceVanillaGeneration=false". I also had trouble with Mojang screen stuck with a white screen when I updated modpack. I was able to fix that by setting the launcher to install to a new folder (deleting the Tekkit mod folder didn't help). And I noticed the "Basic Circuit 8984" requires "Copper Wire" in the recipe but that does not exist so NEI shows "Unnamed 149" in the recipe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TokiWartooth Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 Ok, I thought I had TE circutry figured out, but after playing with atomic science I am more confused than ever, so a series of questions 1) does redstone conduit have a max capacity of MJ/t transfer? if yes what is it? 2) does an energy tesseract have a transfer capacity MJ/t? If yes again what is it? 3) why do redstone energy cells drain one at a time when wired in parallel into a tesseract if it has no capacity limit and the stuff on the other side can handle faster energy transfers? 4) regarding AS/UE values whats the conversion rate of MJ-KW? - reason I ask is I would like to know how much energy a fusion reactor will draw to start it's reaction so i can tell if the output is correct in positive power cycles. The one way nature of power conduits may end up getting in the way of setting up any better reactors at the moment idk. May put off building more till we get to a later patch and add mek. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jono0259 Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 1) Don't think it has a max I know if it does have a max it is higher than 500MJ/t 2) Energy tesseract max at 100MJ/t (think default setting is 25%loss so would be 75MJ/T) 3) i think it randomly picks cells to drain from and if you required enough energy it would drain from them all. Also there is an output setting on the cell. 4) dunno i will try to test it when i get that far. i would like to know also Hope that helped Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TokiWartooth Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 So in order to simultaneously drain 4 rec's through tesseracts I would have to use 4 senders and 4 receivers? See the odd thing about that is I hooked up a second input pipe(on the same parallel circuit of recs) into the tesseract and the second one started draining as well, It may be that it can send 100mj/t but it needs ~135mj a tick because it loses the 25% before it is actually sent. does that make sense? still that's kinda frustrating, I was operating under the illusion that the tesseracts could send any amount of energy a tick thus setting up all my recs into parallel setups. I may have to rethink my whole power schema then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Discord Moderator plowmanplow Posted June 12, 2013 Discord Moderator Share Posted June 12, 2013 So in order to simultaneously drain 4 rec's through tesseracts I would have to use 4 senders and 4 receivers? Well, by default, yes. However, both the max transfer AND the energy loss are simple config settings. Change them to be more balanced and able to deal with higher power and it becomes a non-issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TokiWartooth Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 I'll be honest I couldn't give two shits about the loss, I'm just surprised at the transfer rate max. I may change that setting, I was operating for a while a 2base setup pulling power from 6rec's and 6 biofuel reactors to power both bases, and at peak operation they could pull about 140 or so a tick, now peak operation was rare but it could happen. I guess with the new mining laser having such a high power requirement this is the first I've run into this as an issue. I guess it's not really a cost issue to just make more racts but esthetically my powerplant is gonna look way worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jono0259 Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 Doesn't have to look bad... this is my setup http://imgur.com/a/JKtcb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmwatford Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 I thought the limit for teserracts was 100MJ/t per side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clawx207 Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 Great update and all, already updated my server to 1.1.1, but it is running a constant 15 tps without any crash reports or forge errors, 1.0.6 runs 20, 1.1.1 causes about 2 second lag spikes constantly. Playable but a little annoying. any suggestions? (not dimensional doors and mystcraft are removed) Edit: Turned chickenchunks chunkloaders down to max 1 chunks per loader, runs 20 tps ._. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingEtzel Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 Got another bug This one is actually important When activating the F7 "Monsterspawning-Grid", it doesn't stick to the surface. See screenshot. It flies through the air depending on the viewing angle. Just Tekkit installed. https://www.dropbox.com/s/pus4g0ho5yzj8ap/Spawngridbug.jpg Also the F9 Chunk grid is affected: https://www.dropbox.com/s/o8b18qvv9yjdeox/Gridbug.jpg Only the blueish Chunkwalls are fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skace Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 So I had to turn of the bigdig type ore generation and I think did it right. Just went into /Config/CofH/World.cfg and set "B:ReplaceVanillaGeneration=false". I also had trouble with Mojang screen stuck with a white screen when I updated modpack. I was able to fix that by setting the launcher to install to a new folder (deleting the Tekkit mod folder didn't help). And I noticed the "Basic Circuit 8984" requires "Copper Wire" in the recipe but that does not exist so NEI shows "Unnamed 149" in the recipe. Setting "B:ReplaceVanillaGeneration=false" only solves the vanilla ores. The default world.cfg with this version has inflated values for nearly everything. For instance, Emerald is part of the custom config and there is also a TE section, both are seperate from default: #################### # emerald #=================== # <UNIFORM> Generation settings for Emerald; Defaults: ClusterSize = 5, NumClusters = 6, MinY = 5, MaxY = 96 #################### emerald { I:BlockId=129 I:BlockMeta=0 I:ClusterSize=5 I:MaxY=96 I:MinY=5 I:NumClusters=6 B:RetroGen=true } I tried to compare the values to my 1.0.6 install but it doesn't have most of these ore types. Does anyone have a suggestion? I've been waiting to install until this config file is accurate to normal gen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingEtzel Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 I'd really like a repaired config too Really want to start in this new version :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Markarthian Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 What's wrong with the newest/any version of OptiFine? Optical zoom is something I have a lot of trouble living without. MPS broke it by using these fancy armor models. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Watson_777 Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 Mek will not be returning before this build goes rec (it'll HOPEFULLY be returning in the next major build), but it sounds like the issue is that basic components isn't getting loaded correctly. I'll investigate. Nooooooo! My multi tanks :( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viktor_Berg Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 MPS broke it by using these fancy armor models. Are you talking about the fact that the armor always faces north, regardless of its wearer's orientation? I thought that was a Smart Moving related bug. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cybird Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 I'm having an issue with Computer Craft terminals. It seems like they no longer output to RedNet Cables. I had a CC Terminal cycling my Combustion Engine arrays so they don't overheat and explode, but since the update its as if the terminal just refuses to output to the RedNet Cable. I've checked that my code is still correct and a signal gets output to normal redstone dust, however it would also seem that the command to turn off the redstone output is not working either, once the terminal powers the redstone dust, there is no way to turn it off with out breaking the terminal. I also tried advanced CC Terminals to see if that would help, sadly it did not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanVox Posted June 12, 2013 Author Share Posted June 12, 2013 Hi, cybird, The way CC terminals interact with rednet changed in 1.53- a computercraft terminal no longer outputs to a single channel as if it were redstone dust. Instead, you use the bundled cable API and treat the rednet cable as bundled cable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingEtzel Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 Hi, CanVox, is there a possiblity to get the correct world.cfg? You said it is obviously the wrong one and I tried to correct the values myself, but I don't have the defaults for the "custom" ores: uranite/quartz/osmium/enderore/emerald/apatite/aluminium/essence. If that's not possible, where could I get these values? Would be great if I could fix that and get started :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanVox Posted June 12, 2013 Author Share Posted June 12, 2013 Hi, Etzel, I'm putting together a new build now, just wanted to gather up more than one bug before I started. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingEtzel Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 Great Thank You Very Much :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lonix Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 so is the "bug fixed" edition gonna be 1.1.2 ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanVox Posted June 12, 2013 Author Share Posted June 12, 2013 1.1.2 doesn't have the basic components bugs fixed, it looks like that's gonna need a bit more work on my part, but everything else should be running great- I'll throw it up now to see if anyone finds something new, and then when I fix the basic components bug, 1.1.3 should be our rec build. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cybird Posted June 12, 2013 Share Posted June 12, 2013 Hi, cybird, The way CC terminals interact with rednet changed in 1.53- a computercraft terminal no longer outputs to a single channel as if it were redstone dust. Instead, you use the bundled cable API and treat the rednet cable as bundled cable. Thanks that sorted it out, for others that may have the same issue simply change your code from rs.setOutput("[DIRECTION]", true/false) to rs.setBundledOutput("[DIRECTION]", 1/0) Obviously there are more complex uses and you should go view a tutorial if you don't know about the Bundled API but making this simple code change worked with my basic control program. Also a tutorial on the bundled cable API using redpower can be found here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanVox Posted June 12, 2013 Author Share Posted June 12, 2013 Time to upgrade- thanks for everyone's help so far: http://forums.technicpack.net/threads/lets-test-tekkit-1-1-2.46817/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts