Lothos

wait, a technic screenshot ( how exactly as modded MC is modded MC regardless ) on your steam account is relevent to counterstrike how?

i dont think mob mods work well with one another.

no, sorry. this IS a case of piracy per the TOS and license of Minecraft. multiple usage copies means multiple accounts needed.

you may think you want a simple opinion of both launchers, but invariably as there have been several of these threads already they end up back at the same point. aside from that, with the sequel to the current technic launcher nearing completion its a moot point as there are indeed shortfalls in the current launcher that will undoubtedly be fixed in the next version.

It was my understanding that 1.4+ implemented passive mob despawning.

I can guarantee you that on the servers that have it enabled, people were forced to rely upon it out of necessity to compete with the rest of the server. Not to mention, just because YOU want to use EE for your OWN fun...doesn't give you the right to destroy a servers economy either.

So.... I never said do that but at least do that?

unless you take sphax's 64x base and patch it, its fine.

i need an update for RP2 textures for 64x....

the problem with EE isn't with whether person A uses it or not, it when person B uses it person A is forced to in order to remain competitive. This is Tekkit Lite after all which means you are playing for SMP and like it or not you have to use all the OP tools that the next guy uses.

I forget the reasoning why icewolf did it, but the tin and copper generate more than enough but above layer 40.

well, spawned sheep can/will despawn, but bred sheep should have remained.

were they all sheep you led into the pen or bred?

which part? the not at the same time or to actually BE funny as I always am :)

No, that is lovingly referred to as "back of the bus moderating". The sad thing is that my post was actually helpful to what the OP made. The other guys, not so much.

The fact you had to ask again after being TOLD where to look pisses people off. We're not the sorts of folks that hand hold....

sorry dragon, i only asked because the youtube in that video is completely blurry to me being next to useless If it has to be a zip, some text instructions on ordering, syntax, etc.. for not only the contents in the root, but if any change to the mods as published in their zips needs to be made.

I would like to know more details on this feature. 1. Can you use a local filepath instead of a url for folks playing SSP? 2. What do you do if you play Technic with a custom zip and Tekkit Lite with a different custom zip? Maybe some kind of list or drop down history. 3. Does it have to be a zip file? Structure of that zip file? And thanks. We've been needing this feature for a while.

you're not failing. mods within the pack will sometimes auto check to see if they have newer versions. Those versions may not be for the base MC version the pack you are using is for. Technic is on 1.2.5 MC for the rec build and the dev is 1.4.6 and you'll get those warnings as an example.

No single mod author has the right to demand to see permissions for someone elses mod being used in the same pack. This is nothing more than a petty power play by an ego driven mod author.

FYI, bear in mind when i had made this thread as Mystcraft has had some updates to it since that time.

you dont edit the jar, you're editing the zip pack of the texture pack. each mod patch generally has its own subfolder you add to the root of the zip. Sphax has a pack for the latest vanilla, but many of the mods have not fully updated. I had to take most of the stuff from my 1.2.5 pack and add it to the 1.4.6 sphax pack.

the guy doesn't learn...he just wanted to troll to see why folks use an "illegal" modpack.

if we're talking EU transfer the best bet is glass fiber given the 40 block distance coverage.

your reply awaits in the other thread.